中大機構典藏-NCU Institutional Repository-提供博碩士論文、考古題、期刊論文、研究計畫等下載:Item 987654321/92767
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 80990/80990 (100%)
造访人次 : 41949260      在线人数 : 813
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/92767


    题名: 搜尋引擎之言論自由與編輯裁量權;Freedom of Speech and Editorial Rights of Search Engine
    作者: 周凡;Chou, Fan
    贡献者: 產業經濟研究所
    关键词: 搜尋引擎;言論自由;編輯裁量權;新聞自由;search engine;freedom of speech;editorial right;freedom of press
    日期: 2023-07-27
    上传时间: 2024-09-19 16:17:51 (UTC+8)
    出版者: 國立中央大學
    摘要: 隨著網路數位平台的崛起,社群媒體如 Facebook 與搜尋引擎 Google 作為科 技巨擘成為各國管制的重點對象,在全球面臨被監管的挑戰。Google 搜尋引擎 服務在人們生活中扮演重要角色的同時也被指責涉及濫用市場地位與其他違反 法律之行為。因此以歐盟為首藉由立法與修法對 Google 進行各種管制措施,以 保障個人資料、隱私權、著作權與解決 Google 市場壟斷之問題。然而學界實務 在討論各國法規範時卻鮮少對 Google 言論自由之基本權利進行討論。
    是以,本文嘗試從美國與歐盟對 Google 的管制方法尋找折衷方法,從 Google 的基本權利與國家管制間取得平衡。本文以美國新聞自由法制發展分析傳統新 聞媒體之基本權利,嘗試以第四權理論建構新聞自由出發,並以民主理論論證 新興媒體對民主政治的重要性,並對傳統新聞媒體之編輯裁量權為分析。其次, 在討論 Google 的編輯裁量權之前,須對 Google 的檢索結果與排名是否為言論自 由之保護範圍為論證。其三,針對 Google 的言論自由與編輯裁量權為分析。
    最後本文列舉各國對 Google 實施的管制措施與當 Google 受到不當干預時, 是否可以透過主張憲法基本權利保護來排除國家的侵害。
    ;With the rise of digital platforms, regulators around the world are fighting against global platforms such as Facebook, Google, etc., in order to resolve all kind of issues. While Google plays a significant role in people’s lives with its search engine service, it has also been accused of market abuse and others violations of laws. Therefore, the European Union has adopted various regulatory approaches to protect personal data, privacy, copyrights and address issues related to Google’s monopoly. However, the discussion concerning Google fundamental’s right are limited within the context of these regulations.
    This article, therefore, seeks to strike a balance between the regulatory approaches of the United States and the European Union towards Google, considering both its fundamental rights and the need for state regulations. This article analyzes the development of the legal system of the traditional media through the U.S. freedom of press, examining the Fourth Estate theory as the fundamental concept for press freedom. Additionally, it employs democratic theory to emphasize the importance of emerging media in democratic politics and explores the editorial discretion exercised by traditional media.
    Furthermore, this article addresses whether Google′s search results and rankings should be protected under the freedom of expression, before delving into an analysis of Google′s own freedom of expression and editorial discretion.
    Finally, this article illustrates various regulatory measures implemented by different countries against Google and whether it is possible to exclude the countries’ infringement by asserting the fundamental rights of the Constitution when Google is improperly interfered.
    显示于类别:[產業經濟研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML50检视/开启


    在NCUIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明